tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729982218599170924.post6293316421536755909..comments2023-08-11T07:57:44.326-07:00Comments on Another Asexual Radical: Sensual CelibacyMagehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10845561077092927717noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729982218599170924.post-2289239523913631382010-11-19T20:45:56.801-08:002010-11-19T20:45:56.801-08:00Owl Eyes, same here. I was actually thinking that ...Owl Eyes, same here. I was actually thinking that my next post might be about "the sensual asexual," because that's what I'm leaning towards identifying as. :p<br /><br />Cerian, I think your point about intimacy being difficult to obtain in any form is really important. It seems like sex is the default form of intimate bonding for many people even if they don't have particularly high sex drives. There's something to be said for exploring one's sensual side without bringing sex into the exploration.Magehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10845561077092927717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729982218599170924.post-18148526741053712002010-11-19T17:05:42.520-08:002010-11-19T17:05:42.520-08:00That could be interesting. As a gynosexual, it'...That could be interesting. As a gynosexual, it's pretty clear to me that a lot of the best things about being "sexual" have nothing to do with sex.<br /><br />I find it really sad that there are few outlets in the world now for actual intimacy; everyone's so dang asocial nowadays.Cerienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04373007983561451615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729982218599170924.post-46486433951732968872010-11-19T13:16:35.115-08:002010-11-19T13:16:35.115-08:00I should check this book out. I always considered ...I should check this book out. I always considered myself "sensual" rather than "sexual" It just made more sense to me.Owl Eyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12793407779982322873noreply@blogger.com